<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Motorola Q: A Field Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socketjockeying.com/2006/11/27/the-motorola-q-a-field-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socketjockeying.com/2006/11/27/the-motorola-q-a-field-report/</link>
	<description>Dispatches from the Petascale World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 03:34:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://socketjockeying.com/2006/11/27/the-motorola-q-a-field-report/#comment-4891</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socketjockeying.wordpress.com/2006/11/27/the-motorola-q-a-field-report/#comment-4891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have always wanted a compendium of novena prayers. Thank you for sharing all these prayers with us. It brings joy and happiness to everyone. I know, I do feel that way.f]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always wanted a compendium of novena prayers. Thank you for sharing all these prayers with us. It brings joy and happiness to everyone. I know, I do feel that way.f</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBerry vs Windows Mobile &#124; Jeremy Phillips</title>
		<link>http://socketjockeying.com/2006/11/27/the-motorola-q-a-field-report/#comment-4879</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BlackBerry vs Windows Mobile &#124; Jeremy Phillips]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socketjockeying.wordpress.com/2006/11/27/the-motorola-q-a-field-report/#comment-4879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] reading the articles he linked to (The Motorola Q: A Field Report &amp; 24 Hours With The Samsung BlackJack - First Impressions) it turns out that Omar&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reading the articles he linked to (The Motorola Q: A Field Report &amp; 24 Hours With The Samsung BlackJack &#8211; First Impressions) it turns out that Omar&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My 24 Hour Affair with a Blackberry 8800 &#171; Socket Jockeying</title>
		<link>http://socketjockeying.com/2006/11/27/the-motorola-q-a-field-report/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[My 24 Hour Affair with a Blackberry 8800 &#171; Socket Jockeying]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socketjockeying.wordpress.com/2006/11/27/the-motorola-q-a-field-report/#comment-222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#183; No Comments  I have a confession to make.  I&#8217;ve been unfaithful.  Those who have read my blog before, may be aware that I&#8217;m in a fairly disappointing relationship with  my current [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &middot; No Comments  I have a confession to make.  I&#8217;ve been unfaithful.  Those who have read my blog before, may be aware that I&#8217;m in a fairly disappointing relationship with  my current [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My 24 Hour Affair with a Blackberry 8800 &#171; Socket Jockeying</title>
		<link>http://socketjockeying.com/2006/11/27/the-motorola-q-a-field-report/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[My 24 Hour Affair with a Blackberry 8800 &#171; Socket Jockeying]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socketjockeying.wordpress.com/2006/11/27/the-motorola-q-a-field-report/#comment-221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  I have a confession to make.&#160; I&#8217;ve been unfaithful.&#160;&#160;Those&#160;who have read my blog&#160;before, may be&#160;aware that I&#8217;m in a fairly disappointing relationship with &#160;my [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  I have a confession to make.&nbsp; I&#8217;ve been unfaithful.&nbsp;&nbsp;Those&nbsp;who have read my blog&nbsp;before, may be&nbsp;aware that I&#8217;m in a fairly disappointing relationship with &nbsp;my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Schreiber</title>
		<link>http://socketjockeying.com/2006/11/27/the-motorola-q-a-field-report/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Schreiber]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socketjockeying.wordpress.com/2006/11/27/the-motorola-q-a-field-report/#comment-34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry John, I suspect you&#039;re out of luck.

I believe that this is because WM treats SMS with the mail metaphor.  That is, each message is a mail object, regardless of origin (SMS, IMAP, POP, Exchange).  This is also why there are things like the intermediary screen I mentioned where the hotkey to the inbox asks &quot;which&quot; inbox.

The only way that you&#039;d get what you&#039;re asking for is for the mail client on WM to support conversation threading (a feature that I understand they have no plans to build any time soon).

In the WM team&#039;s defense, this isn&#039;t that unusual a metaphor for SMS.  It&#039;s only some 3rd party applications and now new things like the iPhone SMS support that treat these are more &quot;on going conversations&quot; (ala IM).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry John, I suspect you&#8217;re out of luck.</p>
<p>I believe that this is because WM treats SMS with the mail metaphor.  That is, each message is a mail object, regardless of origin (SMS, IMAP, POP, Exchange).  This is also why there are things like the intermediary screen I mentioned where the hotkey to the inbox asks &#8220;which&#8221; inbox.</p>
<p>The only way that you&#8217;d get what you&#8217;re asking for is for the mail client on WM to support conversation threading (a feature that I understand they have no plans to build any time soon).</p>
<p>In the WM team&#8217;s defense, this isn&#8217;t that unusual a metaphor for SMS.  It&#8217;s only some 3rd party applications and now new things like the iPhone SMS support that treat these are more &#8220;on going conversations&#8221; (ala IM).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John K</title>
		<link>http://socketjockeying.com/2006/11/27/the-motorola-q-a-field-report/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socketjockeying.wordpress.com/2006/11/27/the-motorola-q-a-field-report/#comment-32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone notice that you CANNOT see the message you&#039;re replying to in SMS/texting?

in other words, you write me a text, and I reply-  Now if you write back, I cannot see the chain history?
OR
Lets say someone responds days later to an SMS/TExt?  i can&#039;t see what they&#039;re responding to, sometimes it makes no sense because the subject is now out of mind.

ANYONE know how to fix or if a fix even exists???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone notice that you CANNOT see the message you&#8217;re replying to in SMS/texting?</p>
<p>in other words, you write me a text, and I reply-  Now if you write back, I cannot see the chain history?<br />
OR<br />
Lets say someone responds days later to an SMS/TExt?  i can&#8217;t see what they&#8217;re responding to, sometimes it makes no sense because the subject is now out of mind.</p>
<p>ANYONE know how to fix or if a fix even exists???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://socketjockeying.com/2006/11/27/the-motorola-q-a-field-report/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 07:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socketjockeying.wordpress.com/2006/11/27/the-motorola-q-a-field-report/#comment-13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve, I really enjoyed your post, especially regarding the fit and finish in the UI.  At my old company I had several models of BlackBerry -- as an email application you could go several days without access to a laptop and not be too put out.  I would never say the same about the Q and Pocket Outlook.  And I agree with you that it won&#039;t get any better until folks in Microsoft are forced to live without desktop Outlook for days on end.

Some other things I really miss about the Blackberry versus the Q and Windows Mobile:

1. Number of messages in memory.  The Q seems to top out at something like 50 messages (I&#039;ve never counted, exactly, but it&#039;s not a lot esp. compared to the BlackBerry) and I don&#039;t see a way to change it.

2. No Sort/Search/Filter.  WTF?  The BlackBerry not only has arbitrary search, it has one-click search by sender and search by subject.  I used that frequently -- it was a great way to trim down long threads.

3. The BlackBerry &quot;Get More&quot; is transparent; you simply wait a bit when you get to the place where it was truncated and it downloads the next chunk in the background.  WM is modal -- you have to explicitly say you want the rest of the message and then you have to Send/Receive.  Yuck.

4. Why can&#039;t you customize the Start menu (delete, re-order)?  If there&#039;s a way to do it, I haven&#039;t figured it out.

5. Why is some stuff in the Start Menu and other stuff in the Control Panel?  There&#039;s no rhyme nor reason as to what lives where.  The BlackBerry is much more consistent although still somewhat arcane in places.

I really want to like the Q more.  The web browser on EVDO is pretty nice and snappy.  There&#039;s lots more software to download and some of it is actually pretty darn good.  

But I can&#039;t imagine using my Q for anything but casual email.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, I really enjoyed your post, especially regarding the fit and finish in the UI.  At my old company I had several models of BlackBerry &#8212; as an email application you could go several days without access to a laptop and not be too put out.  I would never say the same about the Q and Pocket Outlook.  And I agree with you that it won&#8217;t get any better until folks in Microsoft are forced to live without desktop Outlook for days on end.</p>
<p>Some other things I really miss about the Blackberry versus the Q and Windows Mobile:</p>
<p>1. Number of messages in memory.  The Q seems to top out at something like 50 messages (I&#8217;ve never counted, exactly, but it&#8217;s not a lot esp. compared to the BlackBerry) and I don&#8217;t see a way to change it.</p>
<p>2. No Sort/Search/Filter.  WTF?  The BlackBerry not only has arbitrary search, it has one-click search by sender and search by subject.  I used that frequently &#8212; it was a great way to trim down long threads.</p>
<p>3. The BlackBerry &#8220;Get More&#8221; is transparent; you simply wait a bit when you get to the place where it was truncated and it downloads the next chunk in the background.  WM is modal &#8212; you have to explicitly say you want the rest of the message and then you have to Send/Receive.  Yuck.</p>
<p>4. Why can&#8217;t you customize the Start menu (delete, re-order)?  If there&#8217;s a way to do it, I haven&#8217;t figured it out.</p>
<p>5. Why is some stuff in the Start Menu and other stuff in the Control Panel?  There&#8217;s no rhyme nor reason as to what lives where.  The BlackBerry is much more consistent although still somewhat arcane in places.</p>
<p>I really want to like the Q more.  The web browser on EVDO is pretty nice and snappy.  There&#8217;s lots more software to download and some of it is actually pretty darn good.  </p>
<p>But I can&#8217;t imagine using my Q for anything but casual email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Schreiber</title>
		<link>http://socketjockeying.com/2006/11/27/the-motorola-q-a-field-report/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Schreiber]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socketjockeying.wordpress.com/2006/11/27/the-motorola-q-a-field-report/#comment-11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben - You&#039;re quite right, the Palm OS flavor of the Treo is probably better than most (the Win Mobile version of the Treo still has a few more steps/clicks to do many of the same things).  However, I&#039;ve never been a user of either, so I&#039;m not positive, but I&#039;m assuming that you cannot single handedly (and without some kind of &quot;using a thumb as a stylus&quot; gymnastics) do mark-read/unread, move to a folder, etc.  This type of behavior in Windows is usually left to the context menu, and this - depending on if it&#039;s PPC or Smartphone - is either a stylus or a separate smartkey away.  The BB gives this to you with the &quot;right-click&quot; of the scroll wheel, which I always preferred for hardcore on the go email triage.  If the Palm can do the same with minimal hand gymnastics and basically one step, then that&#039;s good to hear.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben &#8211; You&#8217;re quite right, the Palm OS flavor of the Treo is probably better than most (the Win Mobile version of the Treo still has a few more steps/clicks to do many of the same things).  However, I&#8217;ve never been a user of either, so I&#8217;m not positive, but I&#8217;m assuming that you cannot single handedly (and without some kind of &#8220;using a thumb as a stylus&#8221; gymnastics) do mark-read/unread, move to a folder, etc.  This type of behavior in Windows is usually left to the context menu, and this &#8211; depending on if it&#8217;s PPC or Smartphone &#8211; is either a stylus or a separate smartkey away.  The BB gives this to you with the &#8220;right-click&#8221; of the scroll wheel, which I always preferred for hardcore on the go email triage.  If the Palm can do the same with minimal hand gymnastics and basically one step, then that&#8217;s good to hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Combee</title>
		<link>http://socketjockeying.com/2006/11/27/the-motorola-q-a-field-report/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Combee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 21:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socketjockeying.wordpress.com/2006/11/27/the-motorola-q-a-field-report/#comment-10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a Treo 700p user, and I never use my stylus to triage my email.  The five-way navigation makes it quite easy -- just hit the email button to go to Versamail, then up/down to select my messages, and then backspace to delete the selected one.  After winnowing out what I don&#039;t want to read, I then just scroll up and click the center button to pick the item.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Treo 700p user, and I never use my stylus to triage my email.  The five-way navigation makes it quite easy &#8212; just hit the email button to go to Versamail, then up/down to select my messages, and then backspace to delete the selected one.  After winnowing out what I don&#8217;t want to read, I then just scroll up and click the center button to pick the item.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shahine.com/omar/ - Windows Mobile Shortcomings vs Blackberry</title>
		<link>http://socketjockeying.com/2006/11/27/the-motorola-q-a-field-report/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shahine.com/omar/ - Windows Mobile Shortcomings vs Blackberry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 18:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socketjockeying.wordpress.com/2006/11/27/the-motorola-q-a-field-report/#comment-8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Anyway, my co-worker, Steve Schreiber talks about his experiences with Windows Mobile and the Q and my fellow blogger Greg Hughes talks about his experiences with the Samsung Blackjack (my current phone). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Anyway, my co-worker, Steve Schreiber talks about his experiences with Windows Mobile and the Q and my fellow blogger Greg Hughes talks about his experiences with the Samsung Blackjack (my current phone). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

